![]() ![]() Either gun won't handle a diet of sub gun ammo for long. Maybe because idiots believe it can handle hotter ammo? I dunno. Apparently the CZ-52 has a problem of going "bang, bang, boom!" far more often than the TT-33 does. The roller lock system is stronger, but the gun itself is not. From what I and others can find, that's really not the case. After that, it spread like wildfire because after all "if it's in a gun magazine, it MUST be true!". From what I can find, the idea that it's somehow stronger than the TT-33 dates back to the 70s when some gun writer in their infinite wisdom decided to make that claim. You wouldn't limit 38 Super to 38 ACP levels, so why on earth would you do that for the Tokarev? It's high velocity is what makes it such a cool and effective round.īack to the CZ-52 issue. When you can get factory 85gr ammo that hits 1700 FPS, I find that unacceptable. The 93gr FMJ data maxes out at just over 1300 FPS. As such, the data is what I would consider anemic. The data in the Lyman 49th manual pairs it with the 7.63x25 Mauser, which is a lower pressure round. Reloading data is almost nonexistent, and most online data is labeled "CZ-52 ONLY". Trying to pay around with this awesome little rounds is starting to get annoying.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |